introduction

is it sometimes right to prevent scientific  discovery? i believe it isnt and this isnt right ,because it would lead to a lot of consequences for the futer for example people getting sick, no weponary and bad transport. scientific is really important in these days to keep up with the newest tech, fast transport , new informatin and even our social lives.

paragraph 1

without scientific development it would be like living in a frozwen world with no technological developments; for example imagine if you had too stay with an i phone 4 and every upgrade would be the same, im pretty sure it would be stupid to stop scientific development with this scenario. for example when thye phone wasnt even invented the world felt like they wasnt making any progress and itfelt like the world was frozen.

paragraph 2

i believe people would get sick more often this cause the medicine standards would stay the same. and as new diseases start to rise im pretty sure the scientists wouldnt know how to tackle the diseasse people would just die. for example in the plague people died of how no scientific discovery had been done and im more than sure that the same thing would happen and even worse. this could also affect the averasge age because of how medicine wouldnt be there to extend the peoples life span and could well go to 30 as the average age. for example the ebola virus, there was no medicine to prevent it at the time and it surprised them and so millions of people died and i beleive this could happen again if scientific development.

paragraph 3

war. scientific discovery had a big impact on how war was done and even the weapons. without scientific development im sure this country would’ve been over run by the Germans or any people who tried to rule this country. weaponry is vital to war and so if there was no weapons or more advanced weapons this country would be run by other people therefore its essential that scientific discovery continues so this country wont turn into dog poo. for example in world war one the Germans developed the mini gun which almost beat us bur we still managed to win and without scientific development this would be a different world, we would’ve been ruled by Germans and we would even speak German. also many people would’ve died and all of this just for stopping scientific development. therefor i believe its wrong to stop scientific development for thew good of the people.

paragraph 4

transport is the key of marketing and selling goods . this is why we have developed planes to go over long distances and transport our goods and even boats which can transport on sea. also us … the trains and busses allow us to go to work and without them we wouldnt be able to go to work.without scientific development peoplr wouldnt of created the revolutionar boat or plane or bus. without the boat trading wouldnr of been a thing, even colonizing wouldn’t of been a thing and development in anyway wouldnt of been a thing .tjis is why scientific development has to continue because if it wasn’t for this, the world you see right now wouldn’t of happened.also the if buses wast a thing then everybody would go late to work and the economy would go to shit, people wouldn’t be earning money and having kids wouldn’t be a possibility, basically scientific development has to be for everything.

paragraph 5

energy is something we use from a day to day basis for example to charge our phones, to use in our houses, lighting and basically everything in our lives. Everything has been revolutionised to be electronic and to even have Wi-Fi to make out lives easier. Without scientific development none of this would be possible and even our development wouldn’t be possible because we wouldn’t know what carried energy or how to extract the energy out to benefit us and also our phones that we say we can’t live without wouldn’t even exist, therefore in conclusion I believe that stopping scientific development would lead to too much consequences in the long run and will never be a good idea to stop development.